Saving fuel is in

Sustainability in aviation: an overview

11.2016 | Text: Silke Hansen

It is not as if the industry has only just woken up to the issue. Aviation can already point to huge pro­gress in its environ­mental per­formance. Over the past 50 years, CO2 emissions have been reduced by 70 per­cent per passen­ger kilo­meter. In 2015, the average fuel con­sump­tion of German air­lines was only 3.6 liters per 100 passen­ger kilo­meter across all air­craft types and routes, according to cal­cu­la­tions by the German Aviation Association (BDL). However, because the transport sector continues to grow, there are numerous ini­tia­tives designed to make the in­creasing aviation traffic more en­vi­ron­men­tal­ly friendly.

From generation to generation, air­planes and air­craft engines have become in­creas­ingly efficient. Less kero­sene consumption means less CO2. There is a direct re­la­tion­ship between fuel con­sump­tion and emis­si­ons of this green­house gas. Through nu­mer­ous measures, the industry is working on cur­tailing kero­sene con­sump­tion and there­fore green­house gas emissions.

Growth without additional emissions

Today, aviation has committed itself to am­bi­tious goals, both at European and inter­national levels—and in­ci­den­tal­ly, it is the only trans­port sector to do so. In several stages, green­house gases are to be reduced by 75 per­cent per passen­ger kilo­meter by 2050 compared to the year 2000 according to the European aviation research organi­zation ACARE’s Strategic Research and Inno­vation Agenda (SRIA). The Inter­national Air Transport Association (IATA) is pursuing the goal of carbon neutral growth from 2020.

The International Civil Aviation Organization ICAO, the UN’s avia­tion agency, is also targeting air­craft CO2 emissions and wants to put an inter­nationally valid CO2 stand­ard in place. According to this stand­ard, new air­craft from 2020 on should observe the specified CO2 limits, and models that are already in pro­duction should meet the limits by 2023. From 2028, no air­craft that does not comply with the stand­ard should be allowed to take off. “Although avia­tion is currently re­spon­sible for less than two per­cent of annual CO2 emis­sions, we have to struc­ture the expected doubling of world­wide passen­ger traf­fic from 2030 in a re­spon­sible and sus­tain­able way,” warns Presi­dent of the ICAO Council, Dr. Olumuyiwa Benard Aliu. In October 2016, ICAO initiated a global climate agreement designed to sys­tem­ati­cal­ly compensate for growth-related CO2 emissions resulting from air travel from 2020.

Aviation does not affect the climate through CO2 emissions alone, even if their impact is the strongest. The com­bus­tion of kerosene produces air­borne pollu­tants such as nitric oxides, for which ICAO thresholds have long been in place. Another con­tribu­tor to global warming is the creation of contrails and cirrus clouds at high altitudes. Mini­mizing this problem is a job for air traffic manage­ment experts, who should develop new flight routes that mean air­craft can fly lower.

Inside MTU Corporate Responsibility

How sustainable is an individual organization? What can it con­trib­ute to climate pro­tection? What is par­ticu­lar­ly important to it? Answers to these questions are provided by sustain­ability reports, which many big companies now compile. This includes MTU, which publishes annual infor­mation about its sustain­ability objectives and standards as defined by the inter­nationally valid guide­lines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). In this way, the indi­vidual reports can be compared against each other. For the year 2017, this elective measure will become mandatory—at least in Europe. Then a new law will come into force that requires listed companies with more than 500 em­ployees to publish infor­mation on sustain­ability topics. A major focus for MTU is the Clean Air Engine (Claire) agenda, which seeks to reduce the CO2 emissions of air­craft engines by 40 per­cent by 2050 (see also page 45). But that is not all by any means: MTU also shows respon­sibility toward employees, suppliers and society.

Alternative fuels

Sustainable fuels are an alternative to kerosene. However, the require­ments of these fuels as regards energy density, safety and operating char­ac­ter­is­tics are much higher than for road transport. At the moment, several second-generation bio­fuels are author­ized for standard flight operations. These so-called drop-in fuels possess the same char­ac­ter­is­tics as kerosene and can be used for all air­craft and air­ports. World­wide, aviation requires almost 500,000 tons of kerosene every day. The large-scale pro­duction of bio­fuels must not nega­tively impact food pro­duction or bio­diversity. For this reason, special­ists are carrying out research into synthetic fuels manu­factured through process engi­neer­ing so­lu­tions such as using solar energy in the desert to pro­duce avia­tion fuel out of water and CO2. Not all methods are cost-effective yet. According to the Aviation Initiative for Renewable Energy in Germany, alter­native aviation fuels cannot currently be produced at com­peti­tive costs.

As a long-term approach, the industry is inten­sively dis­cussing another possibility: electric flying. “In our estimation, current tech­nol­ogy is still several decades away from an electric-powered A320,” says Dr. Jörg Sieber, who is respon­sible for inno­vation manage­ment at MTU Aero Engines. Electric flying would require much more powerful batteries and electric motors than are avail­able today. “Short-range regional air­craft are con­ceiv­able perhaps in 30 years’ time. For medium- and long-haul flights, suit­able battery concepts are currently lacking.” In view of this, MTU has chosen to invest in hybrid systems com­prising a gas turbine with a generator and electri­cally powered fans. But how sustain­able is electric flying? No oil is burned up in the air­craft’s engine of course, avoiding the emission of harmful exhaust gases, but the elec­tri­city powering the air­craft has to be produced, and must not come from the burning of fossil fuels.

Facts & Figures: Sustainability in the aviation industry

Worldwide, the aviation industry is working for a greener future: over 400 organi­zations in 65 coun­tries have initiated projects designed to reduce green­house gases—including air­craft manu­facturers, air­lines, engine specialists and air­port operators.

Here is a small selection:

First “bioport” in continuous operation: Oslo Air­port mixes biofuels into its fuel hydrant system. Amsterdam and Brisbane plan to follow suit.

Innovative aircraft tractor: Lufthansa’s new TaxiBot brings air­craft from gate to runway with engines stopped.

Green revolution: the Geared Turbofan developed by Pratt & Whitney and MTU reduces CO2 emissions by 16 per­cent in the first generation alone.

New technologies: as part of the EU research programs LEMCOTEC, E-BREAK and ENOVAL, the engine industry is developing tech­nol­ogies for new engines designed to reduce fuel con­sump­tion by up to 26 percent from 2025 (compared to the year 2000).


Silke Hansen, writes for AEROREPORT as a freelance journalist. For over ten years, she has covered the world of aviation focusing on tech­nol­ogy, inno­vation and the market. Corporate re­spon­sibil­ity reporting is another of her specialty areas.

You may also be interested in these articles:

Best connections

11.2016 | To cope with the global rise in air traffic between urban centers, we are going to need quieter aircraft and more efficient airports. Big data applications are among the solutions helping to get passengers and luggage to their destinations quicker than ever.